Pre-seed due diligence checklist: documents, questions, blind spots
The Flaynn pre-seed pre-diligence checklist lists, pillar by pillar, the claims found in most decks, the document that lets an investor check them for themselves, the question to ask on the call and the blind spot that most often sinks a deal. It covers six blocks: market, product, traction, team, finance and use of funds, legal and register. Each line also gives the status Flaynn Intelligence can give the information today according to the Flaynn provenance grid: verified, declared or inferred, with two reading signals, missing and inconsistent.
By Sirven Flaynn Ouamba, founder and president of Flaynn
Published on · Updated on · Version 1.1
One clarification underpins the whole page: an attached document lets the investor check it; it does not make a data point verified at Flaynn. At Flaynn, verified means consistency with a register source; it is neither a banking, legal or accounting audit, nor a human check.
How to use it.
Before the first call. Go through the six blocks with the deck open. For each claim that matters to your reading, find the matching document; if it is missing, request it before the call rather than during it. Prioritise the questions on lines where the document is missing or is not consistent with the deck.
During the call. Start with the differences between two documents on the amount sought, revenue or milestones: these are the answers you can cross-check afterwards.
Before deciding. Go back over the blind spots below. For each one, note whether the dossier answers it with a document, with a simple declaration, or not at all. What remains declared remains for you, your group or your advisers to verify: the checklist structures the reading, while the final checks and the decision are yours.
Prepare your dossier with the checklist.
Preparing a pre-seed round? Read the same tables the other way round: for each claim in your deck, gather the document that makes it verifiable and prepare the answer to the call question. An attached document makes your claim verifiable by the investor; it does not change its provenance status at Flaynn. This checklist gives no access to any investor and promises no outcome.
Documents to request and questions to ask, pillar by pillar.
Attaching a document makes the claim verifiable by you; it does not make the data verified at Flaynn. For a deal you import, the status column mostly shows inferred: the import contains no entered figures, and the company number (SIREN in France) is optional there.
Market
| Deck claim | Document to request | Flaynn status today | Call question | Common blind spot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| « €2bn market » | Bottom-up calculation from customers: number of target customers, annual spend per customer, named sources | Declared (form) or Inferred (deck); external cross-check: Inferred | How many customers in three years, at what annual spend, and where does each figure come from? | Global market with no geographic entry plan |
| « The problem is urgent » | Dated interview records, interviewees' roles | Declared or Inferred | How many interviews, with whom, and what contradicted your hypothesis? | Need described as obvious, with no interview or pre-order |
| « We target SMEs » | Segment, decision-maker, example accounts | Declared (form) or Inferred | Who signs, who pays, who uses it? | Target too broad to be tested |
| « No direct competitor » | Feature-by-feature table against named players | Inferred; competitors found by external research: to be confirmed | What do your customers use today, and why would they switch? | « We are better » with no reasoned differentiation |
| « It is the right time » | Dated, sourced fact: regulation, technology, market | Inferred | What makes this possible now? | Timing asserted with no dated fact |
Product
| Deck claim | Document to request | Flaynn status today | Call question | Common blind spot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Product in production » | Demo or test access, go-live date | Inferred | Show me a real customer's journey. | Technical maturity only declared |
| « Proprietary technology » | Filing number, or what is hard to reproduce | Inferred | What would it take a funded competitor to reproduce it, and how long would it take? | Differentiation with no enforceable proof |
| « Customers love it » | Reachable customer reference, measured usage | Inferred | Can I speak to two active users? | An adjective in place of an observable signal |
| « Defensible advantage » | Nature of the advantage (technology, data, distribution, regulatory, network) and threats | Inferred | What threat would erase this advantage? | Nature of the advantage never named |
| « Both sides will come » (marketplace) | Seeding sequence for supply and demand, tested channel | Inferred | Which side do you seed first, through which channel? | Cold start not addressed |
Traction
At pre-seed, having no revenue is not a negative signal in itself. The evidence suited to the stage is documented interviews, signed letters of intent, active test users, pilots and signed partnerships.
| Deck claim | Document to request | Flaynn status today | Call question | Common blind spot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| « €12k MRR » | Month-by-month billing export, period stated | Declared if entered in the form or read in the document, page cited; Inferred if only spotted by the engine. Verified only for revenue published in the register, with the company identified by the company number entered in the form (SIREN in France) and a name in the register that carries the declared name | What MRR for the last closed month, and how many customers make it up? | « Strong traction » with no raw figure or period |
| « Three letters of intent » | Signed, named letters, with volume and terms | Inferred (attached or cited in the deck); with no document: to request before the call | Which one is binding, and on what condition does it become a paid pilot? | Exploratory letter read as a commitment |
| « +20% per month » | Raw monthly series, starting base included | Inferred | From what base, and what does the series show without the best month? | Growth extrapolated from too small a base |
| « Waiting list of 5,000 » | Conversion to usage or payment, date | Inferred | How many sign-ups have used or paid? | Waiting list with no conversion |
| « Healthy unit economics » | Acquisition cost by channel, unit margin, observed lifetime | Inferred | How much does a customer cost, and in how many months is it paid back? | Unit economics never quantified |
| « Pilot with a large corporate » | Contract or purchase order: scope, duration, consideration | Inferred; with no contract: to request | Is the pilot paid, and what criterion triggers rollout? | Free pilot presented as a customer |
Team
| Deck claim | Document to request | Flaynn status today | Call question | Common blind spot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Full-time team » | Departure date from the previous job, status | Declared (form); « multiple mandates » signal: Inferred | Who has been full-time since when, and who has another activity? | Part-time, with a previous activity not wound down |
| « 10 years in the sector » | Dated career history: employers, roles, achievements | Inferred | What have you delivered that is comparable, and who can vouch for it? | « Strong team » with no name or date |
| « Solo founder, CTO being recruited » | Costed hiring plan within the use of funds, timeline, adviser agreements | Inferred | What budget, what timeline, and what if the hire fails? | Founder with no counterweight |
| « Committed co-founders » | Shareholders' agreement (vesting, departure) | No Flaynn status: document to request. Flaynn gives no legal reading | What vesting applies, and what happens to the code if the technical co-founder leaves? | No founder vesting |
| « The founders keep control » | Fully diluted cap table | Inferred, read in the document; a cap table is not in the register | What share do the founders hold today and after this round? | Founders holding little equity as early as pre-seed |
Finance and use of funds
| Deck claim | Document to request | Flaynn status today | Call question | Common blind spot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| « We are raising €600k » | Same amount in the deck, the form and the forecast | Declared (form); difference between deck and form: Inconsistent | Two amounts are circulating: which is the real target? | Amount that changes from one document to another |
| « 18 months of runway » | Monthly cash plan, burn, hiring assumptions | Inferred: Flaynn estimate, never Declared | What burn with a full team, and in which month do you hit zero? | Burn out of proportion to the amount raised |
| « Product, marketing, hiring » | Breakdown by line item, each item tied to a milestone | Declared (form) or Inferred | Which milestone does each item fund, and by what date? | Generic use of funds |
| « Milestones at 18 months » | Dated, measurable milestones, evidence for past milestones | Declared (form) | Which milestones from earlier versions of the deck have been reached? | « Future » milestone already passed |
| « €3m pre-money » | Method and sourced comparables | Declared or Inferred; Flaynn provides no comparables | How did you set this price? | Valuation with no method |
| « Profitable in year 3 » | Forecast with explicit assumptions | Inferred; financial documents that contradict each other: Inconsistent | Which assumption brings the plan down? | Projections unconnected to the unit economics |
Legal and register
| Deck claim | Document to request | Flaynn status today | Call question | Common blind spot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Company incorporated in 2024 » | SIREN, registration extract | Verified in the register (date, legal form, capital, NAF code) if the company is identified by the company number entered in the form (SIREN in France), its name in the register contains the declared name and the register is the one for its country; Inferred if it is found by its name or by a SIREN picked up in the text | Which entity will issue the securities? | Namesakes, wrong entity |
| « Healthy company » | Insolvency proceedings, strike-off | Verified for the fact recorded in the register; the alert drawn from it: Inferred | What happened, and what has changed? | Recent insolvency proceeding |
| « 2025 revenue of €180k » | Filed annual accounts | Verified in the register if the company is identified by the company number entered in the form (SIREN in France) and its name in the register contains the declared name; the deck figure remains declared, and its difference from the register is a question for the call, never a contradiction | Why does the deck differ from the published accounts? | Deck figure not consistent |
| « Available director » | Active mandates in the register | « Multiple mandates » signal: Inferred | What other mandates, and how much time do you give them? | Several active mandates held at once |
| « Appropriate capital » | Share capital, shareholder current accounts | Verified in the register (amount); fit with the plan: Inferred | How is the business financed until the round? | Very low capital compared with needs |
| « Eligible for JEI, CIR, IR-PME relief » | Opinion from a chartered accountant, documented R&D spending | Inferred: presumptive reading, never tax advice; to be confirmed by a chartered accountant | Who confirmed eligibility, and on which expenses? | Eligibility assumed |
The blind spots that sink a deal.
Any one of these points can sink an otherwise well-built deal:
- no founder vesting;
- a stated market never recalculated from customers;
- unit economics never quantified;
- claims with no document (no letter of intent, no paying customer, no observable metric);
- a founder with no counterweight or costed hiring plan;
- a deck and a dossier that contradict each other;
- a use of funds with no milestone per line item;
- competition with no reasoned differentiation;
- an amount sought with no valuation method.
To read the provenance of each piece of information, see the Flaynn provenance grid. For the scoring across five pillars and the weighting by stage, see the pre-diligence methodology.
Questions about the checklist.
What does verified mean?
If the founder attaches their billing exports, does the data become verified?
At pre-seed, should you require revenue?
What do missing and inconsistent mean?
Does Flaynn say whether to invest?
What this checklist is not.
This checklist is an aid to reading a deal, not investment advice. Flaynn does not recommend investing and gives no legal, accounting, tax, financial or investment advice.
Every deal you import, read with this grid.
Flaynn Intelligence picks out the provenance, inconsistencies, missing data and call questions for you, 5 analyses per month.
Subscribe to Flaynn IntelligencePREPARE YOUR DOSSIER: THE ATELIER, BY INVITATION · THE PROVENANCE GRID
FURTHER READING: PRE-DILIGENCE OR DUE DILIGENCE · READING A PITCH DECK · THE DECK AGAINST THE ACCOUNTS